Author/Authors :
Gao, Yiyang Department of Urology - Minimally Invasive Surgery Center - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology - Guangzhou - Guangdong, China - The First Clinical Academy - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou 511436, China , Liang, Hengrui Nanshan School - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou 511436, China - Department of Urology - Minimally Invasive Surgery Center - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology - Guangzhou - Guangdong, China - The First Clinical Academy - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou 511436, China , Liu, Luhao Department of organ transplantation - The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangzhou 511436, China , Gurioli, Alberto Department of Urology - Turin University of Studies, Italy , Wu, Wenqi Department of Urology - Minimally Invasive Surgery Center - The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University - Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology - Guangzhou - Guangdong, China
Abstract :
Purpose: A meta-analysiswas conducted to compare alpha-blocker (AB) and antimuscarinic (AM) monotherapies
in releasing US-related symptoms.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Medline,
and Cochrane library. Ureteric Symptom Score Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score
(IPSS), quality of life (QoL) and visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) were pooled and compared.
Results: Nine full-text articles met the inclusion criteria and have been included. The studies were conducted in 9
different centers between 2009 and 2016. All articles were RCT studies and a total of 654 patients were recorded
totally, among which 323 were given alpha-blockers while others were given antimuscarinics. Although patients
using alpha-blockers presented lower USSQ scores, no statistically significant difference was recorded in urinary
symptom(SMD 0.5, 95 % CI -0.2 to 1.20, P = 0.159), pain(SMD 0.33, 95 % CI -0.26 to 0.92, P = 0.280),general
health, work performance(SMD-0.34, 95 % CI -0.08 to 0.76, P = 0.115) and sexual performance (all p > 0.05)
(SMD 0.12, 95 % CI -0.10 to 0.34, P = 0.280). Meanwhile IPSS (SMD -0.10, 95 % CI -0.32 to 0.11, P = 0.358),
QoL(SMD-0.03, 95 % CI -0.23 to 0.18, P = 0.802) and VAPS(SMD 0.08, 95 % CI -0.15 to 0.31, P = 0.447) were
similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The analysis suggests that AB showed a similar effect with AM. It is necessary to conduct a larger
and more detailed cohort study and find the population that potentially might benefit most by AM.
Keywords :
alpha-Blockers , antimuscarinics , ureteral stent-related symptoms , meta-analysis