Title of article :
Management of retinal detachment in retinoblastoma with globe conserving treatment
Author/Authors :
Elaraoud Ibrahim Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom , Ch'ng Soon Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom , Karl David Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom , Kalogeropoulos Dimitrios Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom , Chavan Randhir Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom , Sharma Ash Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre - Birmingham, United Kingdom
Abstract :
To investigate the features and outcomes of retinoblastoma (Rb) patients complicated by development of retinal detachment (RD)
following systemic chemotherapy with or without local focal consolidation treatment and without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
Methods: A retrospective study of all Rb patients between April 2002 and April 2012 at a tertiary hospital center (Birmingham Children’s
Hospital and Birmingham Midlands Eye Centre, United Kingdom). All eyes that had developed RD during or after systemic treatment with or
without local focal consolidation treatment were included in the study. The time interval between the type of treatment of Rb, development of
RD and relevant surgical intervention were analyzed. Patients with exudative RD were treated conservatively through observation and patients
with rhegmatogenous RD were treated with scleral buckling. Final anatomical retinal reattachment rate and visual acuity outcomes were
analyzed.
Results: A total of 258 patients were treated for Rb over the 10-year period. One hundred sixty-nine patients were managed with globe
conserving treatment. Ten (5.92%) eyes of 10 patients were complicated with RD. Five eyes were exudative or presumed exudative type of RD
while the other five eyes were rhegmatogenous or presumed rhegmatogenous RD. In the exudative group, two patients achieved visual acuity
(VA) of 0.2 Single Kays (20/32 Snellen), and the other two patients achieved 0.85 and 0.86 Crowded Kays (20/142 and 20/145 Snellen),
respectively, after the RD had resolved. The last patient in the group had to be enucleated due to tumor recurrences. The median time for the
exudative RD to resolve is 15 weeks (range, 4e36 weeks). In the rhegmatogenous group, 3 of the 4 operated patients achieved retinal
reattachment. The final postoperative VA ranged between 0.05 Crowded Kays to 1.84 Crowded Kays (20/22 to 20/1384 Snellen). The other
patient was treated conservatively as no retinal breaks were found with previous cryotherapy and thermotherapy. The final VA in this patient was
hand movement, and the RD did not reattach. The median time for the rhegmatogenous RD to reattach is 6 weeks (range, 4e8 weeks). There
were no intra- and postoperative complications.
Conclusions: With long-term conservative management through observation, exudative Rb after systemic treatment of Rb will tend to resolve by
itself. However, supplementary local treatment with cryoretinopexy or laser photocoagulation during the systemic treatment of Rb can lead to an
increased risk of rhegmatogenous RD. In these cases, most rhegmatogenous RD are successfully repaired with non-drainage scleral buckling and
cryoretinopexy.
Keywords :
Cryoretinopexy , Scleral buckling , Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment , Retinoblastoma
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology