Title of article :
Contrast and spatial frequency modulation for diagnosis of amblyopia: An electrophysiological approach
Author/Authors :
Mohammadi Alireza Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology - Noor Eye Hospital - Tehran, Iran , Hashemi Hassan Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology - Noor Eye Hospital - Tehran, Iran , Valadkhan Mehrnaz Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology - Noor Eye Hospital - Tehran, Iran , Mirzajani Ali Department of Optometry - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , jafarzadehpur Ebrahim Department of Optometry - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Yekta Abbasali Refractive Errors Research Center - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences - Mashhad, Iran , Khabazkhoob Mehdi Department of Medical Surgical Nursing - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
To evaluate the diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and to find out which test setting has the most sensitivity and
specificity for amblyopia diagnosis.
Methods: Thirty-three adult anisometropic amblyopes were intended in this study and were tested for visual evoked potentials with different
stimulus conditions including three spatial frequencies [1, 2, and 4-cycles-per-degree (cpd)] at four contrast levels (100, 50, 25, and 5%).We also
tested psychophysical contrast sensitivity and compared the results with electrophysiological ones. We plotted Receiver Operating Characteristic
(ROC) curve for each VEP recording and psychophysical contrast sensitivity to evaluate the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and cutpoint
value of each test stimulus for detecting amblyopic eyes.
Results: Thirty-three amblyopic and 33 non-amblyopic eyes were examined for psychophysical contrast sensitivity and VEPs. Area under the
ROC curve (AURC) findings showed that VEP with different stimulus settings can significantly detect amblyopic eyes, as well as psychophysical
contrast sensitivity test. We found that P100 amplitudes had the largest AURC in response to stimuli of 2-cpd spatial frequency at 50 (P < 0.001)
and 25% (P < 0.001) contrast levels, respectively. Cut-off amplitudes for these stimuli were 8.65 and 4.50 mV, which had a sensitivity of 0.758
and 0.697 and a specificity of 0.788 and 0.848, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of VEP P100 amplitude in response to the stimuli
with 2 cpd spatial frequency and 50 and 25% contrast were greater than the findings obtained from psychophysical contrast sensitivity test.
Conclusion: According to our findings, assessment of VEP amplitudes in response to stimuli of 2-cpd spatial frequency at 50 and 25% contrast
levels can best detect amblyopia with highest sensitivity and specificity and thus, are the protocols of choice for detection of amblyopic eyes.
Keywords :
Contrast sensitivity , Visual evoked potentials , Amblyopia
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology