Title of article :
Developing a Checklist for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Quality Control in Emergency Department; a Qualitative Study
Author/Authors :
Afzalimoghaddam, Mohammad Emergency Department - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Karimialavijeh, Ehsan Emergency Department - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Zakipour, Gholamreza Emergency Department - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mirfazaelian, Hadi Emergency Department - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Nejati, Amir Prehospital and hospital emergency research center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Payandemehr, Pooya Emergency Department - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Introduction: Monitoring the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) could help in achieving favorable
outcomes, decreasing mortality, and preventing post-CPR neurologic sequels. This study aimed to generate
a user-friendly checklist for CPR quality control in emergency department (ED). Methods: A qualitative study
was performed between January and December 2018. In the first step, two emergency medicine specialists
searched currently available databases and extracted the factors related to CPR quality. Afterward, two sessions
of focus group discussions were held. The participants included four emergency medicine specialists, two ED
managers, one anesthesiologist, and one cardiologist. Subsequently, 20 medical specialists, consisting of 10
emergency medicine specialists, six anesthesiologists, and four cardiologists, were invited to a Delphi panel in
order to rate the extracted items from the prior group discussions. Results: During the two rounds of focus
group discussions, 38 items related to the quality of CPR were identified. A Delphi panel evaluated the items; 31
items with at least 75% agreement were selected. These 31 items were included in the final checklist and after
a pilot study and adjustment of its content they were sorted in 10 categories as follows: 1. chest compression,
2. airway, 3. bag-mask ventilation, 4. cardiac monitoring, 5. defibrillation, 6. intravenous (IV) drug delivery, 7.
Medications, 8. Advanced airway, 9. CPR sequence, and 10. Reversible causes. Conclusion: Our study provides
a checklist for monitoring the quality of CPR in ED, but it is still necessary to include other factors related to the
ED environment on this checklist.
Keywords :
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart arrest , quality control , Emergency Medicine
Journal title :
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine (AAEM)