Author/Authors :
Irina, Kiseleva Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Ekaterina, Stepanova Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Elena, Krutikova Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Svetlana, Donina Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Andrey, Rekstin Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Ekaterina, Bazhenova Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Maria, Pisareva Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Anastasia, Katelnikova Institute of Preclinical Research Ltd, St Petersburg, Russia , Kirill, Kryshen Institute of Preclinical Research Ltd, St Petersburg, Russia , Arman, Muzhikyan Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Elena, Grigorieva Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution , Larisa, Rudenko Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia - Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution
Abstract :
Introduction: The global co-circulation of two influenza B virus genetic lineages known
as B/Yamagata and B/Victoria may lead to a mismatch between the circulating virus and
the strain recommended for use in influenza vaccines. Little is known about the protective
efficacy of unmatched influenza B strains, especially when it comes to live attenuated
influenza vaccine. The main purpose of this study was to demonstrate the viability of using
live attenuated influenza vaccine developed on B/USSR/60/69 backbone to protect against
heterologous influenza B challenge infection. Methods: To estimate the potential crossprotective
activity of mono- and trivalent live attenuated vaccines based on B/Victoria or
B/Yamagata genetic lineage virus against a heterological challenge, ferrets were given one
dose of vaccine and then were challenged with influenza B virus. The ferrets were then
monitored for clinical signs associated with influenza infection. Samples of the ferrets’
airways were tested for the presence of the challenge virus. Results: Mono- and trivalent
live attenuated influenza vaccines were shown to be safe and cross-protective against
genetically different influenza B viruses based on virological and histological data and
clinical signs. A lower titer of heterologous challenge virus in the airways of the vaccinated
ferrets compared to mock-vaccinated animals inoculated with the challenge virus was
detected. Interestingly, B/Victoria-based vaccines were more cross-protective compared
with B/Yamagata-based vaccines. Conclusion: In the case of mismatches of B component
of the trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine and lineage of the circulating influenza B
viruses, one of the options could be using trivalent preparation containing a B/Victoria
lineage component.