Author/Authors :
Marsh, Michael N Department of Gastroenterology - Luton & Dunstable University Hospitals Trust, Luton, United Kingdom , Johnson, Matt W Department of Gastroenterology - Luton & Dunstable University Hospitals Trust, Luton, United Kingdom , Rostami, Kamran Department of Gastroenterology - Alexandra Hospital, Worcestershire, United Kingdom
Abstract :
Individuals with particular genetic backgrounds develop immune responses to wheat proteins and become ‘glutensensitised’. Mucosal pathology arises through activated mucosal T lymphocytes, resulting in a graded, adverse reaction
between particular genes and wheat proteins. Given these varied influences, the Marsh Classification broadly itemises
those stages through which a normal mucosa (Marsh 0) evolves in becoming ‘flat’ (Marsh I, II, III).
Recently, Oberhuber and colleagues suggested that Marsh III lesions required subdividing into a, b, c categories. We
critically examined these subdivisions by means of correlative light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Our
results demonstrate that Oberhuber’s classification is untenable. In our view deriving from our observations, the
artificial subdivisions proposed by those authors actually reflect misinterpretations of the true architectural contours of
flat mucosae. Although these workers refer to “villous projections”, SEM demonstrates that no such structures are
present on flat - or immediately recovering – mucosae.
Our data revealed on the surfaces of flat (Marsh III) mucosae, large open “basins”, surrounded by raised collars - the
latter, when viewed in histological section, being easily misconstrued as “villi”. It seems that with subsequent upward
growth, these collars coalesce into low ridges, thence becoming broader and higher convolutions. It is noticeable that
there are more open spaces on the surfaces of flat mucosae than was appreciated hitherto. We conclude that Oberhuber’s
revisions of Marsh III into three subcategories (a, b, c), are misinterpretations of the histological appearances of flattened
mucosae. Therefore, histopathologists when classifying celiac mucosae, since they add nothing either of diagnostic, nor
prognostic, value should resist these subcategories.
Keywords :
Scanning EM , Marsh celiac classification , Marsh III lesion , Mosaic , Mucosal surface contour