Author/Authors :
Ataeian, Milad Department of Physical Therapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Musculoskeletal Research Center - Rehabilitation Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Shafizadegan, Zohreh Department of Physical Therapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Musculoskeletal Research Center - Rehabilitation Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran , Rahnemai-Azar, Amir Ata Department of Orthopedics - University of Washington, Seattle, USA , Irrgang, James J Department of Orthopaedic Surgery - University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA , Rezaeian, Zahra Sadat Department of Physical Therapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Musculoskeletal Research Center - Rehabilitation Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Abstract :
Background: The knee outcome survey-activities of daily living
(KOS-ADL) scale is a self-reported measure to determine knee
function and symptoms in individuals suffering from a variety
of knee disorders. The present study aimed to assess the validity,
reliability, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Persian version
of the KOS-ADL scale.
Methods: In this cross-sectional and psychometric study, 130
patients (14 men and 116 women) with different grades of knee
osteoarthritis were recruited. The construct validity of the scale
was examined through the correlation between the domains of
KOS-ADL and the subclasses of the knee injury and osteoarthritis
outcome score (KOOS). To assess the test-retest reliability, 40 of the
participants were requested to fill in the questionnaire again with
an 8-day interval. The internal consistency of the questionnaire and
its subclasses was evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.
To evaluate construct validity, concurrent construct validity was
examined with a correlation matrix using Pearson’s correlation
coefficients between the KOS-ADL domains and KOOS total
score and subclasses. The test-retest reliability was analyzed using
the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The Kappa coefficient
was used to determine the intra-rater agreement.
Results: The Persian version of the KOS-ADL scale had good
reliability (ICC=0.79) and internal consistency (α=0.92). There
was a good correlation between the KOS-ADL total score and
KOOS subclasses (r≥0.71, P≤0.001).
Conclusion: The Persian version of the KOS-ADL scale is
a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the symptoms and
functional status of people suffering from knee osteoarthritis.
Keywords :
Outcome measure, Knee , Osteoarthritis , Persian , Validity and reliability