Author/Authors :
Mohseni, Mohammad Javad Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Shojaie, Layla Department of Medicine - Research Center for Liver Disease - Keck School of Medicine - University of Southern California - Los Angeles, USA , Majidi Zolbin, Masoumeh Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mohseni, Alireza Tracheal Disease Research Center - National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Amirzargar, Hossein Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Hekmati, Pooya Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Kajbafzadeh, Abdol-Mohammad Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Arshadi, Hamid Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy - Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Context: Endoscopic therapy has been introduced for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) treatment from the early 1980s and emerged as
the first-line treatment in all grades of VUR. Various materials have been used for the endoscopic suburethral application, and their
curative role has been characterized by different potential. In this study, we aimed to summarize the global experience with the
various bulking agents used for endoscopic treatment of VUR, especially the cure and complication rates, and review our newly
introduced bulking agent.
Evidence Acquisition: The current literature and our experience on the outcome of endoscopic treatment with different bulking
agents were reviewed.
Results: Various foreign materials have been used for endoscopic suburethral injections, and their success rate has been different
from 40 to ≤ 90 percent. Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA), currently the most common bulking agent used for
VUR resolution, is an artificial material that helps to grow collagen and fibroblasts. Activation of the immune reaction and the
formation of granuloma pseudocysts are impediments after the injection of this agent. Therefore, despite the better consequences
in comparison to other agents, the use of this material might be associated with the risk of appearance of serious and persistent
complications.
Conclusions: Our newly designed decellularized prepuce tissue as a biocompatible tissue-engineered bulking agent, is comparable
to Dx/HA regarding low immunoreaction and inflammatory responses with lower price. So, it could be a proper candidate for future
randomized clinical trials to investigate the potential of clinical application of the current bulking agent; moreover, it can be an
appropriate alternative for Dx/HA.
Keywords :
Endoscopic Treatment , Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) , Tissue-Engineering , Bulking Agent