Title of article :
Radiation Safety in Children in Children’s Medical Center Hospital
Author/Authors :
Mehdizadeh, Mehrzad Department of Radiology - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Babakhan Kondori, Nasir Department of Radiology - Namazi Hospital - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz , Changizi, Vahid Department of Radiology - Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Sadeghi, Zahra Department of Radiology - Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: Diagnostic radiology studies in children harbor more radiation hazards than in adults due to their small size and
higher cellular proliferation rate. Therefore, reducing the radiation burden to children should be top priority. Measurement of
radiation dose is the first step to this goal. Nevertheless, we do not know whether the radiation of portable radiographs at our
hospital meets the standards or not.
Objectives: This study aims at measuring the primary and scattered radiation at different distances from patients. This eventually
would help us to keep the radiation to minimum.
Methods: This study was conducted on 84 patients from 4 different wards (U1-U2) in our hospital in 2017. After obtaining ethical
approval from ethical committee and also written consent from parents, all patients who needed portable X-ray were included in
our study. A thermo-luminescent dosimeter was placed on the patient’s chest to measure the entrance surface dose (ESD), while
Geiger-Muller dosimeters located at one and two-meter distances from the X-ray tube used to scale the scattered radiation. Then,
data were analyzed in SPSS 16.
Results: The average ESD was 0.3873, 0.3867, 0.3700, and 0.4033 millisievert (mSv) in U1 to U4 respectively, whereas the scattered
radiation doses measured as 0.00986, 0.00750, 0.01250, 0.1014 at one-meter and 0.00250, 0.00220, 0.00238, 0.00314 mSv at twometer distances. There was no significant difference in radiation dose between those units (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Radiation received by patients in this study was three to four times higher than the standard dose. Significant scattered radiation was also detected at one and two-meter distances. To reduce radiation, improvement of exposure protocols such as reducing mAs and using proper shielding is emphasized.
Keywords :
Entrance Surface Dose , Pediatric Radiation , Portable Radiology , Radiation Dose , Thermo-Luminescent Dosimeter
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics