Title of article :
Impact of Multi-criteria Optimization on 6-MV Flattening Filter-Free Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Craniospinal Irradiation
Author/Authors :
Mohandass, P. Department of Physics - School of Sciences, Arts, Media, and Management- Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India , Khanna, D. Department of Physics - School of Sciences, Arts, Media, and Management- Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India , Selvaganapathi, A. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Nishaanth, B. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Saravanan, C. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Thiyagaraj,T. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Bhalla, N. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Puri, A. Department of Radiation Oncology - Fortis Cancer Institute - Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India , Blessy, M. Chitkara School of Health Sciences - Chitkara University, Punjab, India
Pages :
8
From page :
386
To page :
393
Abstract :
Introduction: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is an advanced technique used for radiotherapy treatment using different optimization modes. The present study aimed to evaluate Multi-criteria Optimization (MCO) influence on VMAT for Craniospinal Irradiation. Material and Methods: Fifteen CSI patients treated with 23.4 Gy/13 fractions followed by a boost dose of 6-MV flattening filter-free beams were chosen for this study. Conventional VMAT (c-VMAT) plans were generated for Elekta Versa HD™ linear accelerator. Keeping all other parameters constant, c-VMAT plans combined with MCO (MCO-VMAT) were created for comparison. We compared homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (D98%), organ at risk (OAR) dose, normal tissue integral dose (NTID), volume receiving ≥ 5 Gy and ≥ 10 Gy by normal tissue, delivery time (DT), monitor units (MUs), and calculation time (CT). Results: Our findings demonstrated that HI and CI improved slightly in MCO-VMAT, in comparison with c-VMAT (P>0.05). No significant dose difference was observed in D98% for PTV and volume receiving the dose of ≥ 5 Gy, ≥ 10 Gy, and NTID (P>0.05). A slight increase was found in maximum dose to PTV in VMAT-MCO, compared to c-VMAT (P>0.05). The mean dose, max dose, and dose received by OAR were significantly lower in VMAT-MCO as compared to c-VMAT (P<0.05). The MU, CT, and DT were noticed to be lower in c-VMAT than MCO-VMAT (P>0.05). Conclusion: The MCO-VMAT can be used for CSI, without compromising target coverage, reduced OAR dose by accepting a slight increase of MUs, delivery and calculation time as compare to c-VMAT.
Farsi abstract :
فاقد چكيده فارسي
Keywords :
Craniospinal Irradiation , Monaco™ , Multi-Criteria Optimization , Volumetric Modulated Arc , Therapy
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP)
Serial Year :
2020
Record number :
2519113
Link To Document :
بازگشت