Title of article :
Placement of Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports Using the Single-Incision Technique: Outcomes and Complications
Author/Authors :
Jin Jang, Seo Department of Radiology - Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital - School of Medicine - Dongguk University, Goyang, South Korea , Hyun Kwon, Jae Department of Radiology - Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital - School of Medicine - Dongguk University, Goyang, South Korea , Ki Cha, Yoon Department of Radiology - Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital - School of Medicine - Dongguk University, Goyang, South Korea , Kim, Do Yeun Department of Internal Medicine - Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital - Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea
Abstract :
Background: A totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is an essential component of care for oncology patients. Conventional placement of the TIVAP is performed through the internal jugular vein or the subclavian vein using a tunneled catheter,
which involves creating two incisions. However, the conventional technique has several potential limitations. To address these
limitations, a single-incision technique without a second incision or subcutaneous tunneling has been extensively tested since first
being introduced by Glenn in 2007.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical success, clinical outcomes, and complications of the singleincision technique for the placement of TIVAPs.
PatientsandMethods: Between January 2013 and June 2017, 182 TIVAPs were placed by a single-incision technique in 175 patients, including 79 men and 96 women (mean age, 62.4 years; range: 20 - 88 years). Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed
to obtain patient data, outcomes, and complication rates.
Results: A total of 40,594 catheter maintenance days (median, 221.9 days; range, 1 - 889 days) were recorded for 182 TIVAPs in 176
patients. Technical and clinical success rates were both 100%. A total of 25 complications (complication rate, 13.74%) occurred, including catheter occlusion (5.49%), catheter-related infection (5.49%), wound dehiscence (1.10%), catheter kinking (0.55%), venous
thrombosis (0.55%), and extravasation during infusion (0.55%).
Conclusion: The single-incision technique for TIVAP via the axillary vein was safe and efficient with high technical and clinical
success rates. This new technique may be a good alternative to conventional techniques.
Keywords :
Central Venous Access , Venous Access Ports , Catheters, Axillary Vein , Complications
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Radiology (IJR)