Title of article :
Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Research Version (SCID-5-RV): A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Author/Authors :
Mohammadkhani, Parvaneh University of SocialWelfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran , Setareh Forouzan, Ameneh University of SocialWelfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran , Hooshyari, Zahra Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Abasi, Imaneh Department of Clinical Psychology - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: The structured clinical interview for DSM-5 has recently been revised to reflect the new findings in the diagnostic
criteria of psychological disorders.
Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian translation of structured clinical interview
for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-fifth edition (DSM-5)-research version (SCID-5-RV) on Iranian adult
population.
Methods: In the current diagnostic accuracy study a total of 305 clinical samples were admitted to fifteen adult clinical settings
and a subsample of these participants (n = 50, with a mean age of 34.31 and a standard deviation of 11.96) was recruited to evaluate
test-retest reliability, and 40 non-clinical participants were recruited to examine construct validity. All participants completed the
Millon Clinical Multiaxial inventory-III (MCMI-III) and Brief Symptom inventory (BSI).
Results: SCID psychometric properties indicated an acceptable range for internal consistency (0.95 - 0.99), test-retest reliability
(0.60 - 0.79), and Kappa reliability (0.57 - 0.72). Further, the agreement between interviewer and psychiatrist diagnoses was assessed
using the Kappa index, and the result was satisfactory. The current diagnostic accuracy study used sensitivity and specificity indexes
to assess the diagnostic validity of SCID by positive predictive value and also negative predictive value under the “likelihood ratio”
domain. Specificity values for most psychiatric disorders were high; the sensitivity values were to somewhat lower. Furthermore,
SCID-5-RV categorical diagnoses demonstrated an acceptable construct validity based on the significant differences between the
clinical and non-clinical samples in all subscales of BSI except for phobia as well as all clinical subscales of MCMI-III.
Conclusions: In general, the Persian translation of SCID-5-RV represented acceptable reliability and validity for various categorical
diagnoses in different clinical settings.
Keywords :
Assessment , Diagnostic Interview , Psychometrics Properties , Psychological Disorders
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS)