Title of article :
An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Persian Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index
Author/Authors :
Barzegar Bafrooei, Ebrahim Department of Speech Therapy - University of SocialWelfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khatoonabadi, Ahmadreza Department of Speech Therapy - School of Rehabilitation - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Maroufizadeh, Saman Department of Biostatistics - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Bakhtiyari, Jalal Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center - Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran , rajaee, Ali Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center - Al-Zahra Hospital Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia harms all aspects of a person’s life, including behaviors, activities, and social situations.
Quality of life is a multidimensional concept. The dysphagia handicap index (DHI) is a patient-reported outcomes tool that evaluates
the different dimensions of quality of life in three physical, emotional, and functional factors in English-speaking countries. The
validity of the Persian version of the dysphagia handicap index (DHI) has been evaluated in a study, but the reliability and factor
analysis of the Persian version has not been investigated in any study.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the factor structure analysis and reliability of the Persian version of the dysphagia handicap
index (P-DHI).
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (mean age 55.6915.04, 53 women) completed
the dysphagia handicap index (DHI). The severity of dysphagia was defined as follows: 1 for no dysphagia (normal), 2 and 3 for mild,
4, and 5 for moderate and 6 and 7for severe. Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach’s
alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed to evaluate the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of
the P-DHI, respectively.
Results: The results of CFA provided support for a second-order three-factor model of P-DHI (2 = 484.61, df = 273, (P = 0.0001), 2/df
= 1.77; CFI = 0.901; RMSEA = 0.088 and SRMR = 0.010). The Cronbach’s alpha for physical, functional, and emotional subscales and
total score were 0.751, 0.836, 0.773, and 0.900, respectively. The test-retest reliability of the P-DHI for the total score and subscales was
high (ICC: 0.952 - 0.988). Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between the P-DHI total score and self-reported severity
of dysphagia (P = 0.0001), while there were no relationships between P-DHI total score and age (P = 0.223), sex (P = 0.936), level of
education (P = 0.113), disease duration (P = 0.126).
Conclusions: The P-DHI is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the disabling effects of swallowing disorders on the one’s
Quality of Life in Iranian patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to a variety of diseases. Also, the CFA findings provide support
for the tree-factor structure of the P-DHI and the use of the subscales as distinct variables.
Farsi abstract :
فاقد چكيده فارسي
Keywords :
Deglutition Disorders , Dysphagia , Quality of Life , Persian
Journal title :
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health