Title of article :
Effect of saliva contamination and different decontamination procedures on micro leakage of composite restorations
Author/Authors :
Darabi, Farideh Department of Operative Dentistry - School of Dentistry - Dental Sciences Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Tavangar, Maryam Department of Operative Dentistry - School of Dentistry - Dental Sciences Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Tayefeh Davalloo, Reza Department of Operative Dentistry - School of Dentistry - Dental Sciences Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Ebrahimi, Maryam Dentist , khanderu, Hessam Department of Operative Dentistry - School of Dentistry - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction:
A few studies have investigated the effect of saliva contamination of cured or uncured adhesive
systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate
the effect of salivary contamination and different decontamination methods on microleakage
of composite restorations
Materials and methods:
Class V cavities (2 mm wide, 1.5 mm deep, and
4 mm long) were prepared on buccal and lingual
surfaces of 135 extracted human premolars. The
specimens were randomly divided into 9 groups,
30 cavities in each. The materials used consisted
of single bond (3M) and Z250 (3M). Except group
1 (Control), in Groups 2-5, uncured adhesive, and
in groups 6-9 cured adhesive was contaminated
with saliva (30 s). Decontaminating procedures
were: blot-drying, rebonding (Groups 3 and 6),
rinsing, air-drying, rebonding (Groups 4 and 7),
rinsing, blot-drying, rebonding (Groups 8 and5).
In groups 2and 9 no decontamination procedure
was done. After restoring the cavities, thermo-cycling and dye penetration, they were sectioned buccolingually and analyzed by stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis
and Dunn tests (P<0.05).
Results:
In occlusal margins; there were no significant
differences in the microleakage between groups
3,4,5 with group 1(P>0.05) but in gingival margin,
there were significant differences in the microleakage between all of the groups with group1(P=
0.0001).
Conclusion:
None of the methods in this study could reduce
the micro leakage in the cavities with both enamel and dentin margins.
Keywords :
Composite Resins , Dentin-Bonding Agent , Saliva
Journal title :
Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery