Author/Authors :
Abbassinia, Marzieh Center of Excellence for Occupational Health - Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Kalatpour, Omid Center of Excellence for Occupational Health - Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Motamedzade, Majid Department of Ergonomics - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Soltanian, Alireza Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Mohammadfam, Iraj Center of Excellence for Occupational Health - Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Human error is one of the major causes of accidents in the petrochemical industry. Under
critical situation, human error is affected by complex factors. Managing such a situation is important to
prevent losses and injury. This study aimed to develop a dynamic model of human error assessment in
emergencies in the petrochemical industry.
Study design: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: Fuzzy Bayesian network was used to improve the capabilities of the method for determining
the control mode. Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS method was also used to prioritize emergency scenarios and
human error assessment was applied for the most important emergency condition.
Results: Fire in a chemical storage unit was recognized as the most important emergency condition.
Common Performance Conditions (CPCs) were determined based on the opinions of a panel of 30
experts and specialists and 7 CPCs were selected for emergencies; then, based on the results of AHP
method the relative weights were determined. Finally, membership functions, inputs, and outputs of fuzzy
sets, CPC values in 8 emergency response tasks, and the probability of control modes were determined
using Bayesian Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) method.
Conclusion: This method could be applied to overcome the weaknesses of traditional methods, provide
a repeatable method for human error assessment, and manage human error in an emergency.