Author/Authors :
Naghsh, Narges Dental Implants Research Center - Department of Periodontology - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Kachuie, Mahdi Dental Implants Research Center - Department of Periodontology - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Kachuie, Marzie Dental Research Center - Department of Orthodontics - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Birang, Reza Dental Research Center - Department of Periodontology - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity is a common oral problem that occurs as a short and sharp pain. There are many techniques to treat this condition, the latest of which is laser treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two types of low-power diode lasers (660 nm and 810 nm) on
dentin hypersensitivity in order to achieve an acceptable clinical application by adjusting the effective
parameters.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, sensitive teeth of 7 patients were divided into
three groups with a randomized matching method: group I, treated with 660-nm diode laser irradiation,
group II, treated with diode laser 810-nm, and group III, the control group. Irradiation parameters for
660-nm and 810-nm diode lasers were the power of 30 mW and 100 mW respectively, in contact
and continuous modes, perpendicular to the tooth surface with a sweeping motion. Treatments were
carried out in four sessions at weekly intervals. The data obtained were analyzed with SPSS 22, using
one-way repeated measures ANOVA and the LSD (least significant difference) test. The significance
level was considered as P≤0.05.
Results: There were no significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS) score changes between
the two laser groups after the intervention in the first, second and third weeks compared to the baseline
(P>0.05). These changes in the fourth week were significantly higher in the 810-nm laser group
compared to the 660-nm laser group (P=0.04), and in the 660-nm laser group, they were more than
the control group (P=0.02). The mean VAS scores at 1-week, 1-month and 2-month postoperative
intervals were significantly lower in the 810-nm laser group than in the 660-nm laser group, and in
the 660-nm laser group, they were less than the control group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The use of 660-nm and 810-nm diode lasers with the power of 30 and 100 mW
respectively for 120 seconds was effective in reducing pain in patients with dentin hypersensitivity.
However, the effect of the 810-nm laser on reducing the dentin hypersensitivity was more long-lasting than that of the 660-nm laser.