Title of article :
Prophylactic Tracheostomy for Inhalational Burns
Author/Authors :
Aggarwal, Abhinav Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Kumar Chittoria, Ravi Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Chavan, Vinayak Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Likhitha Reddy, Chirra Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Gupta, Saurabh Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Bharathi Mohan, Padmalakshmi Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , Pathan, Imran Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India , K, Shijina Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) - Pondicherry - 605006 - India
Abstract :
BACKGROUND
Various studies have reported different conclusions over the safety and benefits of early tracheostomy in burns. Our study aimed to
assess the role of prophylactic tracheostomy in treatment and
improvement of outcomes in inhalational burns in India.
METHODS
In a retrospective descriptive analysis of burns admitted over 1
year in Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education
and Research (JIPMER) Tertiary Burns Center in India, patients
with thermal burns of TBSA less than 60% and those with indirect
evidence of airway burns were enrolled and divided into two
groups who underwent prophylactic tracheostomy vs. patients for
whom prophylactic tracheostomy was not done. Mortality was
the final point and primary variable measurement.
RESULTS
Totally, 10 patients with inhalational burns were admitted.
Out of the 4 patients for whom prophylactic tracheostomy was
undertaken, three patients survived, while one died. Out of the 6
patients for which prophylactic tracheostomy were not performed,
4 patients died; while 2 survived.
The average percentage of burns TBSA in the prophylactic
tracheostomy group was 34%. Average age of patients in the
prophylactic tracheostomy group was 31.3 years. The average
percentage burns TBSA in the group, where prophylactic
tracheostomy was not carried out was 42%. Average age of
patients in the prophylactic tracheostomy group was 36.2 years.
CONCLUSION
Our study is a pilot study to investigate the possibility and a way
to improve outcomes in patients with inhalational injuries. Larger trials may be needed to facilitate or disprove the same.
Keywords :
Prophylactic , Tracheostomy , Inhalation , Burns
Journal title :
World Journal of Plastic Surgery