Title of article :
The Comparison of A New Durable Coronaplasty Technique with Norfolk Method for Glans Reconstruction after Phalloplasty
Author/Authors :
Akhoondinasab, Mohammad Reza Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - St. Fatima Hospital - School of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Saboury, Mahdy Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - St. Fatima Hospital - School of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Shafaeei, Yousef Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - St. Fatima Hospital - School of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Forghani, Siamak Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - St. Fatima Hospital - School of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Fatemi, Mohammad Javad Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - St. Fatima Hospital - School of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
BACKGROUND
Phalloplasty is the most amazing reconstructive surgery, and has a vital role in the quality of life of transsexual patients. There
are several techniques for glans sculpting, but none of them had
long-lasting results. In the present study, a new technique was
introduced and compared with Norfolk technique for coronaplasty
following phalloplasty.
METHODS
In the present randomized controlled study, 40 transgender
patients were enrolled from February 2016 to December 2018,
at St. Fatima Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center. The
patients were randomly assigned in two groups including 20
patients with anterolateral thigh flap (ALT)/radial forearm free
flap (RFFF) phalloplasty followed with our new coronaplasty
technique (group 1) and 20 patients with ALT flap/RFFF
phalloplasty followed with Norfolk technique (group 2).
RESULTS
Almost 85% of the patients underwent the surgery with the
new technique were satisfied with the outcome of surgery and
considered it acceptable within 6-month follow-up, however,
only 70% of the patients in Norfolk technique group reported
acceptable results, which was significantly lower than the new
technique. Similarly, within 12-month follow-up, 80 and 40%
of the patients, respectively in new and Norfolk groups reported
acceptable results, which was also significantly higher in the new
technique.
CONCLUSION
This new technique showed remarkably better results relative to
the usual technique for glans sculpting in transsexual patients.
Moreover, it had the ability to be easily applied along with ALT/ RFFF flaps in both immediate and delayed situations.
Keywords :
Transsexual , Phalloplasty , Coronaplasty , Norfolk
Journal title :
World Journal of Plastic Surgery