Title of article :
Innovative Use of Graphite Pencil in Cranioplasty
Author/Authors :
Bharathi Mohan, Padmalakshmi Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , Kumar Chittoria, Ravi Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , Gupta, Saurabh Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , Aggarwal, Abhinav Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , Likhitha Reddy, Chirra Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , K, Shijina Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India , Pathan, Imran Department of Plastic Surgery - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Education and Research (JIPMER) - Puducherry - India
Abstract :
Graphite pencil is a common utility used in day to day activity for writing. But, its use has been limited only to writing in paper. In Plastic surgery, marking of the bone or maxillofacial prosthesis
is a routine practice, but is usually done with methylene blue or
felt tipped skin markers. In this article, we would like to report
our innovation of extending the use of graphite pencil in marking
cranioplasty moulds. This innovation was done in the Department
of Plastic Surgery, in a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, India.
During routine cranioplasties done in our department, marking
of the mould (acrylic or autologous) was done with methylene
blue dye, but faced the disadvantage of getting washed away with
irrigation or body fluids. Hence a graphite tip pencil was used in
this study. It cost about 0.07 US$. It was sterilized using ethylene
trioxide (ETO, Figure 1). It was found that it did not get washed
away with irrigation fluids. It did not stain the adjacent tissues and
the marking lasted till the end of the procedure Post-procedure,
there were no reports of any foreign body reaction or infection.
Use of markers in surgeries has been in practice since long
time ago. In 1912, the demand for improved skin marking
techniques arose when James Thompson popularized the concept
of intraoperative mapping for cleft lip repair.1 These markings
aid the surgeon in presuming the future probable surgical design,
before making an irreversible step of the surgery which is cutting.
As plastic surgeons, we always use methylene blue, but the
markings get obliterated as soon as the procedure begins, due to
irrigation fluids and blood.
Another problem with methylene blue and felt tipped markers
is when used in a wet surface, the marking leaks and smudges
to the adjacent surfaces. Tattooing is the solution for the above
issues; but in bone, it is not possible to tattoo due to absence of
dermis. These issues can be easily obviated by the use of graphite
pencils. Graphite gets seated in the rough surface of the bone or
the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and thus mimics tattooing.
Above is also the reason why graphite pencil does not work for
smooth implants like stainless steel or non porous titanium.
Keywords :
Cranioplasty , Graphite pencil , Methylene blue
Journal title :
World Journal of Plastic Surgery