Title of article :
Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary‑Fixated Iris‑Claw Intraocular Lens
Author/Authors :
Mansoori, Tarannum Sita Lakshmi Glaucoma Center - Anand Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India , Agraharam, Satish Gooty Vitreo‑Retinal Department - Anand Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India , Sannapuri, Sravanthi Vitreo‑Retinal Department - Anand Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India , Manwani, Sunny Vitreo‑Retinal Department - Anand Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India , Balakrishna, Nagalla Department of Statistics - National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Abstract :
Purpose: To assess the visual outcome and complications following retropupillary-fixated iris‑claw intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
Methods: For this retrospective, non-comparative study, chart review of patients who underwent retropupillary iris‑claw IOL implantation
for the correction of aphakia from July 2014 to October 2018 and had a minimum postoperative follow‑up of 2 months was carried out.
Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and complications were noted.
Results: One hundred and twenty‑two eyes of 122 patients (mean follow‑up: 7.48 ± 5.2 months, range, 2 months‑3.5 years) were enrolled in the
study. The mean logMAR CDVA improved from 1.36 ± 0.52 preoperatively to 0.5 ± 0.42 postoperatively, at the last follow‑up visit (P < 0.0001).
The final CDVA improved in 110 eyes (90.2%), remained unchanged in 8 eyes (6.6%), and worsened in 4 eyes (3.3%). In cases of pre‑existing
cystoid macular edema (CME) or excessive intraoperative manipulations, 0.05 ml of 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) was injected
at the end of the surgery. Twenty eyes (16.4%) had transient ocular hypertension (OHT), 6 eyes (4.9%) had persistent OHT, and 2 eyes (1.6%)
progressed to glaucoma. Choroidal detachment was noted in 2 eyes (1.6%), CME in 6 eyes (4.9%), 2 eyes (1.6%) had retinal detachment,
20 eyes (16.4%) had significant ovalization of pupil, 8 eyes (6.6%) had one haptic disenclavation, 1 eye (0.8%) had corneal decompensation, and
1 eye (0.8%) had endophthalmitis.
Conclusions: Retropupillary iris‑claw IOL provides good visual rehabilitation with a few complications. Its ease of insertion and short surgical
time makes it a good option to correct aphakia in patients with an inadequate capsular support
Keywords :
Aphakia , Non-comparative study , Retropupillary iris‑claw lens , Secondary intraocular lens
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology