Title of article :
Forming Optimal Projection Images from Intra‑Retinal Layers Using Curvelet‑Based Image Fusion Method
Author/Authors :
Jalili, Jalil Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Unit - Ophthalmic Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,Iran , Rabbani, Hossein Medical Image and Signal Processing Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Mehri Dehnavi, Alireza Medical Image and Signal Processing Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Kafieh, Raheleh Medical Image and Signal Processing Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Akhlaghi, Mohammadreza Department of Ophthalmology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Image fusion is the process of combining the information of several input images
into one image. Projection images obtained from three‑dimensional (3D) optical coherence
tomography (OCT) can show inlier retinal pathology and abnormalities that are not visible in
conventional fundus images. In recent years, the projection image is often made by an average on all
retina that causes to lose many intraretinal details. Methods: In this study, we focus on the formation
of optimum projection images from retinal layers using Curvelet‑based image fusion. The latter
consists of three main steps. In the earlier studies, macular spectral 3D data using diffusion map‑based
OCT were segmented into 12 different boundaries identifying 11 retinal layers in three dimensions.
In the second step, projection images are attained using conducting some statistical methods on the
space between each pair of boundaries. In the next step, retinal layers are merged using Curvelet
transform to make the final projection images. Results: These images contain integrated retinal depth
information as well as an ideal opportunity to better extract retinal features such as vessels and the
macula region. Finally, qualitative and quantitative evaluations show the superiority of this method
to the average‑based and wavelet‑based fusion methods. Overall, our method obtains the best results
for image fusion in all terms such as entropy (6.7744) and AG (9.5491). Conclusion: Creating an
image with more and detailed information made by the Curvelet-based image fusion has significantly
higher contrast. There are also many thin veins in Curvelet-based fused image, which are absent in
average-based and wavelet-based fused images
Keywords :
Curvelet transform , image fusion , optical coherence tomography , projection image , retina
Journal title :
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors (JMSS)