Title of article :
Fourier Analysis of Keratometric Data in Epithelium Removal versus Epithelial Disruption Corneal Cross-linking
Author/Authors :
Bamdad, Shahram Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Zaheryani, Mohammad Salar Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Mohaghegh, Sahar School of Rehabilitation - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran , Shirvani, Mohammad Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare epithelium-removal and epithelium-disruption corneal
crosslinking (CXL) methods in Fourier analysis of keratometric data and clinical
outcomes. Methods: In this double masked randomized clinical trial, each eye of 34 patients with bilateral keratoconus was randomly allocated to either the epithelium-removal or epithelium-disruption CXL treatment groups. Ocular examination, refraction,
uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (UCVA and BSCVA, respectively)
measurements, and Pentacam imaging (keratometry, pachymetry, and Fourier analysis)
were performed at baseline and at six-month follow-up period.
Results: Patients’ mean age was 23.3 ± 3.6 years. The preoperative thickness of the
thinnest point was 459.20 ± 37.40 μm and 455.80 ± 32.70 μm in the epithelium-removal
and epithelial-disruption CXL groups , respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding figures
were 433.50 ± 33.50 μm and 451.90 ± 39.70 μm, respectively, six months after the
treatment (P = 0.0001). Irregularity component of the fourier analysis was 0.030 ± 0.016
μm in the epithelium-removal group and 0.028 ± 0.011 μm in the epithelium-disruption
group preoperatively (P > 0.05). This measurement was 0.031 ± 0.016 μm and 0.024
± 0.009 μm, respectively at month 6 (P = 0.04). The epithelium-disruption CXL group
had better results in terms of the thickness of the thinnest point and the irregularity
component as compared to the epithelium-removal group. The two study groups were
comparable in spherical equivalent, mean keratometry, UCVA, BSCVA, or other Fourier
analysis components (spherical R min, spherical eccentricity, central, peripheral regular
astigmatism, and maximum decentration) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study shows that epithelium-disruption CXL is superior to epitheliumremoval
CXL regarding the short-term changes in pachymetry and corneal irregularity.
Other evaluated parameters were comparable between the two techniques.
Keywords :
Corneal Cross Linking , Epithelium Disruption , Epithelium Removal , Fourier Analysis , Keratoconus , Randomized Controlled Trial , Transepithelial
Journal title :
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research