Author/Authors :
Robati, Shahin Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Saab, Wiam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - The American University of Beirut Medical Centre, Beirut, Lebanon , Durán-Retamal, Montserrat Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Saab, Wael Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Theodorou, Efstathios Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Cawood, Suzanne Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Serhal, Paul Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom , Seshadri, Srividya Institute for Women’s Health - Faculty of Population Health Sciences - University College London, Lebanon, United Kingdom
Abstract :
Background: The advent of ovarian stimulation within an in vitro fertilization (IVF)
cycle has resulted in modifying the physiology of stimulated cycles and has helped
optimize pregnancy outcomes. In this regard, the importance of progesterone (P4)
elevation at time of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration within an
IVF cycle has been studied over several decades. Our study aimed to evaluate the association
of P4 levels at time of hCG trigger with live birth rate (LBR), clinical
pregnancy rate (CPR) and miscarriage rate (MR) in fresh IVF or IVF-ICSI cycles.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study (n=170) involving patients attending
the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health (CRGH) in London. The study cohort
consisted of women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist
or GnRH agonist protocols. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses
were used to evaluate the association of clinical outcomes. Differences were
considered statistically significant if p0.05.
Results: As serum progesterone increased, a decrease in LBR was observed. Following
multivariate logistical analyses, LBR significantly decreased with P4 thresholds
of 4.0 ng/ml (OR 0.42, 95% CI:0.17-1.0) and 4.5 ng/ml (OR 0.35, 95% CI:0.12-0.96).
Conclusion: P4 levels are important in specific groups and the findings were statistically
significant with a P4 threshold value between 4.0-4.5 ng/ml. Therefore, it
seems logical to selectively measure serum P4 levels for patients who have ovarian
dysfunction or an ovulatory cycles and accordingly prepare the individualized management
packages for such patients
Keywords :
ART , hCG trigger , In vitro fertilization (IVF) , Live birth rate (LBR) , Ovarian stimulation , Progesterone elevation