Title of article :
Visual Outcomes of Adding Erythropoietin to Methylprednisolone for Treatment of Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis
Author/Authors :
Soltan Sanjari, Mostafa Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Pakdel, Farzad Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Moosavi, Fatemeh Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Pirmarzdashti, Niloofar Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Nojomi, Marzieh Department of Community Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Haghighi, Anoosheh Internal Medicine Department - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Hashemi, Masih Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Bahmani Kashkouli, Mohsen Ophthalmology Department - Eye Research Center - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Pages :
7
From page :
299
To page :
305
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare the short-term visual function results and safety of erythropoietin as an add-on to the standard corticosteroid therapy in retrobulbar optic neuritis (RON). Methods: In this prospective pilot study, adult patients with isolated RON with less than 10 days of onset were enrolled. Patients were consecutively assigned to standard intravenous methylprednisolone treatment either in combination with intravenous erythropoietin (20,000 units/day for three days) (group-1) or intravenous methylprednisolone alone (group-2). Primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which was assessed up to 120 days from the day the treatment was begun. Systemic evaluations were performed during and after treatment. Results: Sixty-two patients with RON (mean age = 26.6 ± 5.77 years; range = 18–40 years) were enrolled into the study (group-1, 𝑛 = 35; group-2, 𝑛 = 27). BCVA three months after the treatment was 0.19 ± 0.55 logMAR and 0.11 ± 0.32 logMAR in group-1 and group-2, respectively (95% CI: −0.61 − 0.16; 𝑃 = 0.62). Change in BCVA after three months was 2.84 ± 3.49 logMAR in group-1 and 2.46 ± 1.40 logMAR in group-2 (95% CI: −0.93−1.91; 𝑃 = 0.57). Pace of recovery was not significantly different between the groups. No complications were detected among patients. Conclusion: Intravenous erythropoietin as an add-on did not significantly improve the visual outcome in terms of visual acuity, visual field, and contrast sensitivity compared to traditional intravenous corticosteroid. This pilot study supports the safety profile of intravenous human recombinant erythropoietin, and it may help formulate future investigations with a larger sample size.
Keywords :
Contrast Sensitivity , Erythropoietin , Optic Neuritis , Optic Neuroprotection , Optic Nerve Regeneration , Visual Acuity , Visual Function
Journal title :
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
Serial Year :
2019
Record number :
2523209
Link To Document :
بازگشت