Author/Authors :
Jamali, Leila Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany , Alikhani, Babak Center for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Diakovere gGmbH, Hannover, Germany , Getzin, Tobias Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany , Imeen Ringe, Kristina Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany , Wacker, Frank K Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany , Raatschen, Hans‑Jürgen Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Abstract :
Background: The aim of this study was to optimize computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocols
with regard to improve vascular attenuation without increasing contrast media (CM) volumes. Therefore, we compared
the standard CTPA protocol to an individualized contrast media injection protocols adjusted for the patient’s body mass
index (BMI). Materials and Methods: Two groups of 295 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) have been receiving
CTPA. Group 1 received a standard protocol without taking patient’s BMI into account. Group 2 received a CTPA scan, where
dose and flow rate of CM injections were adjusted for the patient’s BMI. Images were retrospectively analyzed by drawing regions
of interests in defined positions in the superior vena cava, descending aorta, the pulmonary main trunk as well as the left and right
lower lobe arteries. Intravascular attenuation, contrast volumes, and flow rates were compared using unpaired t‑tests. Furthermore, a
qualitative image analysis was performed by two experienced readers blinded for the protocol used for image acquisition to evaluate
the image quality and arterial attenuation. Results: Patient’s BMI was similar in both the groups (27.5 ± 1.5 kg/m2 vs. 28.4 ± 2.1 kg/m2;
P = 0.67). Contrast volumes were lower (54.2 ± 4.8 ml vs. 55 ml; P < 0.05), and flow rates (4.1 ± 0.3 ml/s vs. 3.5 ml/s; P < 0.05) were
significantly higher in the individualized protocol. The qualitative image analysis yielded an agreement on diagnostic interpretability
in the individualized and standard group of 49% and 51% (95% Wilson confidence interval for mean), respectively. Conclusion: An
individualized CTPA protocol based on the patient’s BMI reduced the contrast media volume and led to an increased pulmonary
artery enhancement improving image quality, particularly in the evaluation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries. Thus, contrast
media volumes in CTPA should be adjusted for the patient’s BMI.
Keywords :
pulmonary embolism , contrast media , computed tomography pulmonary angiography , Body mass index