Title of article :
Association of coronary artery dominance and mortality rate and complications in patients with ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Author/Authors :
Mikaeilvand, Amir Department of Cardiology - Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , Firuozi, Ata Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center - Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Basiri, Hosseinali Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center - Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Varghaei, Aida Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , Izadpanah, Peyman Department of Cardiovascular Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Kojuri, Javad Department of Cardiovascular Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Abdi-Ardekani, Alireza Department of Cardiovascular Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Attar, Armin Department of Cardiovascular Medicine - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for patients with ST‑segment elevation myocardial
infarction (STEMI). Effect of coronary artery dominance on the patients’ outcome following primary PCI (PPCI) is not fully
investigated. We investigated the association of coronary artery dominance with complications and 1‑year mortality rate of PPCI.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with STEMI treated with PPCI from March 2016 to February 2018
were divided into three groups based on their coronary dominancy: left dominance (LD), right dominance (RD), and codominant.
Demographic characteristics, medical history, results of physical examination, electrocardiography, angiography, and echocardiography
were compared between the groups. Results: Of 491 patients included in this study, 34 patients (7%) were LD and 22 patients (4.5%)
were codominant. Accordingly, 54 propensity‑matched RD patients were included in the analysis. The demographics and comorbidities
of the three groups were not different (P > 0.05); however, all patients in the RD group had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)
3, while five patients in the LD and five patients in the codominant group had a TIMI ≤2 (P = 0.006). At admission, the median left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was highest in RD patients and lowest in LD and codominant patients (34%, P = 0.009). There was
no difference in terms of success or complications of PCI, in‑hospital, and 1‑year mortality rate (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with
left coronary artery dominance had a higher value of indicators of worse outcomes, such as lower LVEF and TIMI ≤ 2, compared with
RD patients, but not different rates of success or complications of PCI, in‑hospital, and 1‑year mortality. This finding may suggest that
interventionists should prepare themselves with protective measures for no‑reflow and slow‑flow phenomenon and also mechanical
circulatory support before performing PPCI in LD patients.
Keywords :
ST‑ segment elevation myocardial infarction , percutaneous coronary intervention , coronary vessels , Coronary circulation
Journal title :
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences