Title of article :
Lumbar Facet Joint Block: Computed Tomography Guided Technique Compared with Fluoroscopy Guided Technique Using the Posterior Approach: A Comparative Study
Author/Authors :
AL-SHATOURI, MOHAMAD A. Suez Canal University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radiodiagnosis, Egypt , SHEHATA, ADEL A. Suez Canal University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radiodiagnosis, Egypt , KHALIL, TAREK H. Suez Canal University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radiodiagnosis, Egypt , ABOU MADAWI, ALI M. Suez Canal University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Neurosurgery, Egypt , EL-SHATOURY, HASSAN A.
Abstract :
Background: Facet joint is a main source of chronic lowback pain with a prevalence of 16.7%. Clinical examinationand imaging are insufficient to diagnose facet joint syndrome(30% accuracy and 45% false positives). Facet joint block isthe gold standard in diagnosis of facet joint syndrome. It canalso relieve pain for up to 6 months. It can be done undercomputed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopy.Objective: To identify which imaging modality is moresuitable to guide the procedure of lumbar facet joint block, fluoroscopy or CT.Materials and Methods: Thirty four lumbar facet joint srepresented by 12 patients were injected in the radiology department, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egyptfrom 1/2005 to 1/2006. All cases were suspected of having facet joint syndrome based on clinical or radiological data.After clinical examination and reviewing lumbar images to identify target facets, every patient underwent facet jointblock under either CT or fluoroscopy.Results: Fluoroscopy was more successful in guiding the injections (success rate 77.7% compared with 31.25% in CTguidance). It is also faster (6.6 minutes per joint comparedwith 10.9 minutes for CT guidance). Less number of trials were required (1.7 trial compared with 6.6 trials with CTguidance). Fluoroscopy exposed the patients and the radiologist to much irradiation (21.3 rad compared to 0.3 rad in CTguidance). Decreased bone density and laminectomy impair fluoroscopy guidance. CT guidance is difficult in patients with marked arthropathy and coronally oriented joints (8 trials compared with 5.6 for normally appearing joints).Conclusion: Fluoroscopy should be the primary choice for guiding lumbar facet joint block. It is more successful andfaster. Its disadvantages include much irradiation to patients and radiologists, and difficulty in patients with laminectomyand decreased bone density. CT can then be used to guide the block.
Keywords :
Lumbar facet joint block , Facet syndrome , Fluoroscopy , Computed tomography
Journal title :
The Medical Journal of Cairo University
Journal title :
The Medical Journal of Cairo University