Title of article :
Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients
Author/Authors :
Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. Mansoura University - Urology Nephrology Center - Department of Radiology, Egypt , Shokeir, Ahmed A. Mansoura University - Urology Department - Urology Nephrology Center, Egypt , Refaie, Huda F. Mansoura University - Urology Nephrology Center - Department of Radiology, Egypt , El-Nahas, Ahmed R. Mansoura University - Urology and Nephrology Center - Urology Department, Egypt
Abstract :
Objective: To evaluate the detectability, size, location and density of uri nary stones with unenhanced computed tomography (CT), using the half-radiation (low) dose (LDCT) technique, compared with the standard-dose CT (SDCT), in obese patients. Patients and methods: The study included 50 patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 and bilateral renal stones diagnosed with SDCT, and managed on one side. All the patients had LDCT during the follow-up and SDCT was used as a ref erence for comparison. Results: Of the 50 patients, the right side was affected in 27 and the left side in 23. In all, 35 patients had a single stone while the remaining ≤ 5 had multiple stones. With SDCT, 95 stones were detected; there were 45 of 65 mm, 46 of 6–15 mm and only four of 15 mm. LDCT barely detected three stones of 3 mm, compared with SDCT, while larger stones had the same appearance at both scans. The site of stone in the kidney or the ureter did not affect its detection on LDCT vs. SDCT. The mean stone diameter was identical in both techniques. At LDCT, all stones were detected with no difference in their number, location or density vs. SDCT. However, the tube current and radiation dose were significantly lower with LDCT. Conclusions: In obese patients with stone disease, LDCT is as accurate as SDCT, while avoiding exposure of the patient to high-dose radiation.
Keywords :
Stones , Radiation , Low dose , Obesity , Multi , detector CT
Journal title :
AJU - Arab Journal of Urology
Journal title :
AJU - Arab Journal of Urology