Title of article :
Turkish Society of Cardiology consensus paper on management of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy
Author/Authors :
Ulus, Taner Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Eskişehir Osmangazi University - Eskişehir-Turkey , Okyay, Kaan Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Başkent University - Ankara-Turkey , Kutsi Kabul, Hasan Department of Cardiology - Gülhane Training and Research Hospital - Ankara-Turkey , Evren Özcan, Emin Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Dokuz Eylül University - İzmir-Turkey , Özeke, Özcan Department of Cardiology - Health Sciences University - Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital - Ankara-Turkey , Altay, Hakan Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Başkent University - İstanbul-Turkey , Görenek, Bülent Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Eskişehir Osmangazi University - Eskişehir-Turkey , Yıldırır, Aylin Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Başkent University - Ankara-Turkey , Okutucu, Sercan Department of Cardiology - Memorial Ankara Hospital - Ankara-Turkey , Tekin, Abdullah Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Başkent University - Adana-Turkey
Abstract :
Background
Heart failure (HF) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. The identification of causes of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is important in terms of initiating causal treatment and improving prognosis. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is a potentially reversible form of cardiomyopathy (CMP) in which LV dysfunction results from atrial or ventricular arrhythmias (1). It can be resolved by eliminating or effectively treating responsible arrhythmia (2).
Aim of the document Early recognition of the relationship between responsible arrhythmia and CMP is of great importance in terms of the improvement of symptoms, LV systolic dysfunction, and functional status with effective treatment. However, in the clinical practice, AIC
is often overlooked, and arrhythmias are generally seen as the
result of HF. Again, there is a lack of information about the pathophysiology of AIC and the course of the disease after effective
treatment of the responsible arrhythmia. This document is written to give clear messages for further recognition and treatment
of AIC based on the current literature.
Definition AIC is defined as LV systolic dysfunction due to supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia that can be either sustained
or paroxysmal or is characterized by highly frequent ectopic activity (3). AIC can be divided into two categories. Type 1 AIC
(arrhythmia-induced): arrhythmia is accepted as the absolute reason of ventricular dysfunction that returns to normal after
successful treatment of arrhythmia. Type 2 AIC (arrhythmia-mediated): arrhythmia exacerbates the LV dysfunction in patients
with concomitant heart disease, and treatment of the arrhythmia provides partial improvement (4).
Epidemiology The prevalence of HF is increasing worldwide due to better
treatment of acute cardiac events, improvements in medical and
surgical treatment methods, and aging of the population. Approximately 1%–2% of the general population, and >10% of over 70
years old are affected with HF (5). Cardiac arrhythmias generally
occur during the natural course of HF, but sometimes they are the
sole etiology of the unexplained systolic HF or dilated CMP. Reliable epidemiological data regarding the AIC are lacking, and the
prevalence in general is underestimated, given that arrhythmia is
often considered to be a result of rather than a possible cause
of CMP.
Although age is the major determinant of incidence and
prevalence of overall HF, AIC appears to occur at any age. However, the common types of arrhythmias causing AIC differ among
age groups. Focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) (59%) and permanent
Keywords :
Arrhyythmia , Cardiomyopathy , Consensus Paper
Journal title :
The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology: Andolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi