Author/Authors :
Zargham, Mahtab isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Alizadeh, Farshid isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Tadayyon, Farhad isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Khorrami, Mohammad‑Hatef isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Nouri-Mahdavi, Kia isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Gharaati, Mohammad Reza isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Yazdani, Mohammad isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران , Mazdak, Hamid isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Medicine - Department of Urology, ايران
Abstract :
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of an innovative, minimally invasive sling technique with autologous tissue in women with concomitant incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP). Materials and Methods: Fifty‑six women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence and AVWP were randomly assigned into two groups: In Group A (26 patients), anterior colporrhaphy (Kelly placation) and sling placement using a strip of anterior vaginal wall were performed, and in Group B (30 patients), transvaginal mesh correction of AVWP and tension‑free vaginal tape (TVT) insertion (retropubic – craniocaudal route) using polypropylene mesh were carried out. The patients were followed‑up for over 18 months and were assessed objectively using a 48 h frequency‑volume chart, a 48 h pad test and a standardized stress test. Related surgical complications and outcomes were recorded and compared. Results: Surgical cure rates for Group A and Group B at the first (3 days) and last (18 months) post‑operative visits were 62% and 84%; and 54%, and 72%, respectively (P = 0.09 and 0.31). Complications occurred in 9 patients (44%) of Group B, but only 3 patients (12%) in Group A. Conclusion: Vaginal sling surgery using an anterior vaginal wall strip can improve SUI and in comparison with propylene mesh is associated with lower complication rates. Although, the surgical success rate of this technique is lower than T‑Sling, larger studies with selected patients will help assess the suitable patients for this pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Keywords :
Autologous sling , prolapsed , tension free vaginal mesh , urinary incontinence