Title of article :
High-Dose Toremifene as a Promising Candidate Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer with Secondary Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitors
Author/Authors :
Fushimi, Atsushi Department of Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine Daisan Hospital, Japan - Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan , Tabei, Isao Department of Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine Daisan Hospital, Japan - Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan , Fuke, Azusa Department of Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine Daisan Hospital, Japan - Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan , Okamoto, Tomoyoshi Department of Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine Daisan Hospital, Japan , Takeyama, Hiroshi Department of Breast & Endocrine Surgery - The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan
Abstract :
There are currently no established second- and later-line therapies for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive
advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We examined the efficacy of high-dose toremifene (HD-TOR) for this patient group and
whether aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance influences HD-TOR treatment outcome. This retrospective analysis investigated the
outcomes of 19 women with postmenopausal hormone-sensitive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who received HD-TOR,
defined as 120 mg daily from 2012 to 2016. The median follow-up duration was 9.67 months. The overall response rate (ORR)
and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were compared between various clinical subgroups, including patients exhibiting primary or
secondary AI resistance as defined by the timing of recurrence or progression. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was estimated by
the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between subgroups by the log-rank test. The overall ORR was 21.1%, and the CBR
was 31.6%. CBR was significantly higher for patients without liver metastasis (50% vs. 0%, p = 0:044). Nine cases exhibited
primary and eight cases secondary AI resistance. Both ORR and CBR were higher in patients with secondary AI resistance (25%
vs. 0%, p = 0:087; 38% vs. 11%, p = 0:29). The median TTF was 6.2 months in the entire AI-resistant group (n = 17) and was
longer in the secondary resistance subgroup than in the primary resistance subgroup (8.40 vs. 4.87 months; log-rank: p = 0:159).
High-dose TOR appears to be most effective for postmenopausal breast cancer cases with secondary resistance to AIs, cases
without prior AI treatment, and cases without liver metastasis. The detailed mechanisms of AI resistance and the clinical
features of responsive cases need to be further clarified to identify the best candidates for HD-TOR.
Keywords :
Promising Candidate Therapy , Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic , Breast Cancer , Aromatase Inhibitors
Journal title :
International Journal of Breast Cancer