Clinical Evaluation of Outcomes of Penile Prosthesis Implantation and Partner Satisfaction

Objective: We aimed to compare the outcomes of malleable and inflatable penile prosthesis implantations and partner satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Data of 34 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation in two centers between September 2009 and March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Types of prosthesis and complication rates were compared. A telephone interview was performed to assess the satisfaction rates of patients and their partners by EDITS (Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction) questionnaire. Results: The mean age was 56.16±14.49 years for Group 1 and 58.13±10.41 years for Group 2. The mean follow-up durations for Groups 1 and 2 were 29.39±9.38 and 24.13±10.27 months, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 3.56±2.85 and 3.38±2.27 days for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. No significant difference was observed in terms of age, hospital stay, and follow-up duration between groups. Satisfaction questions were similar between the two groups. Patients using the malleable device found it easier to use (p 0.05). Conclusion: Using EDITS, we found that it was easier to use the malleable devices, but both patients and their partners had equal satisfaction rates. Randomized controlled trials addressing bigger populations should be conducted to support our findings.