Title of article :
Evaluation of Different Hygienic Practices Applied in Slaughterhouses and its effect on Beef Quality
Author/Authors :
Elsaid Laban, Samah Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Cairo University, Giza, Egypt , Mahmoud Mashaly, Mohamed Department of food hygiene and control - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Cairo University Giza, Egypt , Aly, Aly Mahrous Faculty of African Postgraduate Studies - Cairo University Giza, Egypt , Essam Maher, Nouran Essam Faculty of Biotechnology - MSA University, 6th October City, Egypt , Moustafa Zaki, Manal Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Abstract :
Meat constitutes the main source of animal protein for human consumers. Hygienic practices undertaken
inside slaughterhouses affect the degree of meat quality and level of contamination. Sources of meat contamination
inside slaughterhouses are; contaminated water, workers, and working environment including; contaminated equipment,
surfaces, and aerosols. In this study, beef samples were collected from three slaughterhouses with different hygienic levels
in Cairo, Egypt. Besides, water samples, environmental swabs, and workers’ hand swabs were collected from different
sites of the same slaughterhouses. Microbiological analysis of samples was applied to determine total bacterial count
(TBC) and total coliform count (TCC). A detailed questionnaire survey and a visual inspection checklist were applied
to workers to assess the hygienic procedures and practices of the slaughterhouses under study. Results showed that
total bacterial counts of beef samples were 3.1, 4.39, 4.43 log10 CFU/g for slaughterhouses 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Total
coliform counts were nil for beef samples of slaughterhouses (1) and (2) and 4.43 log10 for that of the slaughterhouse (3).
TBCs of water samples were 1, 1, and 1.3 log10/ml respectively while coliforms were negative for all samples. TBC of
wall, floor, Knives, hooks, and workers’ hand’s swabs were highest in the slaughterhouse (3) followed by slaughterhouse
(2) and lowest counts were found in the slaughterhouse (1). In conclusion, microbial counts of the analyzed samples
together with answers to the questionnaire revealed that hygienic practices, level of education, training, and experience
were better in the slaughterhouse (1) followed by slaughterhouse (2), and the most unhygienic practices and conditions
were undertaken in the slaughterhouse (3) that was reflexed on the degree of beef contamination.
Keywords :
Slaughterhouses , Beef quality , Contamination , Hygiene
Journal title :
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences