Author/Authors :
recen, duygu izmir democracy university - faculty of dentistry - department of restorative dentistry, İzmir, Turkey , yildirim, bengisu usak university - faculty of dentistry - department of prosthodontics, Usak, Turkey , othman, eman jacksonville university - brooks rehabilitation college of healthcare sciences, school of orthodontics, Jacksonville, USA , comlekoglu, erhan ege university - faculty of dentistry - department of prosthodontics, İzmir, Turkey , aras, isil jacksonville university - brooks rehabilitation college of healthcare sciences, school of orthodontics, Jacksonville, USA
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare MEP which is originally manufactured for increasing bond strength between organic resins and ceramic with conventional surface treatment methods in preparation of leucite-reinforced FC surfaces regarding shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel brackets and the mode of bond failure. Materials and Methods: Forty specimens that were fabricated from FC material and glazed were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods: (1) CoJet Sand; (2) MEP; (3) HF acid etching followed by silane coupling agent; (4) Diamond bur followed by silane coupling agent. The SBS was determined using universal testing machine. Bond failure sites were classified according to Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Results: No statistically significant difference (p 0.05) was found in SBS between the groups while significant intergroup differences were detected concerning ARI scores (p 0.001). Group 1 had ARI score 1 and 2 indicating mode of failure at the adhesive interface with greater percentage of the adhesive left on bracket base. The other groups had higher frequency of ARI score 3 and 2. The quantity of the ARI retained on the ceramic surface was highest in Group 3, followed by Group 4 and Group 2. Conclusion: MEP can be a suitable alternative for bonding metal brackets to FC surface.
Keywords :
Surface treatment methods , Adhesion , Bond performance , Feldspathic ceramic