Title of article :
Functional Outcome after Treatment of Aggressive Tumours in the Distal Radius: Comparison between Reconstruction using Proximal Fibular Graft and Wrist Fusion
Author/Authors :
CY, Choo Department of Orthopaedics - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , AM, Mat-Saad Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Science Unit - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , WS, Wan-Azman Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Science Unit - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , Z, Wan Department of Orthopaedics - Prince Court Medical Centre - Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia , MZ, Nor-Azman Department of Orthopaedics - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , S, Yahaya Department of Orthopaedics - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , WI, Faisham Department of Orthopaedics - Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia
Abstract :
Introduction: Restoration of a functional hand is the ultimate goal following a distal radius tumour resection. The early outcomes of mobile wrist reconstruction are satisfactory; however, long-term results are unpredictable
due to late wrist instability and degenerative arthritis. Our
aim is to compare mobile wrist reconstruction with wrist
fusion (pan-carpal fusion) in our cohort of patients.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was
performed for functional outcomes of all patients who
underwent resection for distal radius tumour and treated with
either fusion or reconstruction of the wrist in a single
institution from years 2000-2013 with a minimum of three
years follow-up.
Results: Eleven patients were included in the study, six of
whom had wrist reconstruction with proximal fibula graft
and the remaining five wrist fusion, with a mean follow-up
of 6.3 years. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society
(MSTS) score was 82.78%, ranging from 70% to 93.3%.
Average grip strength compared to the normal contralateral
hand was 60.0% for total wrist fusion, which was better than
wrist reconstruction with 58.07%. There was no difference in
the functional outcome between fusion and mobile
reconstruction in our study. Osteoarthritis changes and
subluxation of the wrist joint were the most common findings in the long-term follow-up for this group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the functional outcome of the long-term follow-up between the two groups.
Keywords :
distal radius tumour , reconstruction , fusion , outcome
Journal title :
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal