Title of article :
The Results of Two-stage Revision for Methicillin-resistant Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of the Hip
Author/Authors :
A, Santoso Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology - Universitas Sebelas Maret - Solo - Indonesia , TR, Yoon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery - Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital - Jeonnam - Republic of Korea , KS, Park Department of Orthopaedic Surgery - Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital - Jeonnam - Republic of Korea , IB, Anwar Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology - Universitas Sebelas Maret - Solo - Indonesia , P, Utomo Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology - Universitas Sebelas Maret - Solo - Indonesia , B, Soetjahjo Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology - Universitas Sebelas Maret - Solo - Indonesia , T, Sibarani Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology - Universitas Sebelas Maret - Solo - Indonesia
Abstract :
Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip due to methicillin-resistant bacteria is difficult to treat and remain a challenge for arthroplasty surgeon. Material and Methods: Retrospective review was done to the patients who received two-stage revisions with an
antibiotic loaded cement-spacer for PJI of the hip between
January 2010 to May 2015. We found 65 patients (65 hips)
with positive culture findings. Eight patients were lost to
follow-up and excluded from the study. Among the rest of
the 57 patients, methicillin-resistant infection (MR Group)
was found in 28 cases. We also evaluate the 29 other cases
that caused by the other pathogen as control group. We
compared all of the relevant medical records and the
treatment outcomes between the two groups.
Results: The mean of follow-up period was 33.7 months in
the methicillin-resistant group and 28.4 months in the control
group (p = 0.27). The causal pathogens in the methicillinresistant group were: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) in 10 cases, Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in 16 cases and
Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus
(MRCNS) in two cases. The reimplantation rate was 92.8%
and 89.6% in the methicillin-resistant and control group,
respectively (p= 0.66). The rates of recurrent infection after
reimplantation were 23.1% (6/26) in the methicillin-resistant
group and 7.6% (2/26) in the control group (p= 0.12). The overall infection control rate was 71.4% (20/28) and 89.6%
(26/29) in the methicillin-resistant and control group,
respectively (p = 0.08). Both groups showed comparable
baseline data on mean age, BMI, gender distribution, preoperative ESR/CRP/WBC and comorbidities.
Conclusions: Two-stage revision procedure resulted in low
infection control rate and high infection recurrency rate for the treatment of methicillin-resistant periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip. Development of the treatment strategy is needed to improve the outcome of methicillinresistant periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip.
Keywords :
hip joint , periprosthetic infection , methicillin-resistant , two stage revision
Journal title :
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal