Title of article :
Displaced Physeal and Metaphyseal Fractures of Distal Radius in Children. Can Wire Fixation Achieve Better Outcome at Skeletal Maturity than Cast Alone?
Author/Authors :
AH, Syurahbil Department of Orthopaedics - Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , I, Munajat Department of Orthopaedics - Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , EF, Mohd Department of Orthopaedics - Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , D, Hadizie Department of Orthopaedics - Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia , AA, Salim Department of Orthopaedics - Universiti Sains Malaysia - Kubang Kerian - Malaysia
Abstract :
Introduction: Redisplacement following fracture reduction is a known sequela during the casting period in children treated for distal radius fracture. Kirschner wire pinning can be alternatively used to maintain the reduction during fracture healing. This study was conducted to compare the
outcomes at skeletal maturity of distal radius fractures in
children treated with a cast alone or together with a
Kirschner wire transfixation.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study
involving 57 children with metaphyseal and physeal
fractures of the distal radius. There were 30 patients with
metaphyseal fractures, 19 were casted, and 11 were wire
transfixed. There were 27 patients with physeal fractures, 19
were treated with a cast alone, and the remaining eight
underwent pinning with Kirschner wires. All were evaluated
clinically, and radiologically, and their overall outcome
assessed according to the scoring system, at or after skeletal
maturity, at the mean follow-up of 6.5 years (3.0 to 9.0
years). Results: In the metaphysis group, patients treated with wire
fixation had a restriction in wrist palmar flexion (p=0.04)
compared with patients treated with a cast. There was no
radiological difference between cast and wire fixation in the
metaphysis group. In the physis group, restriction of motion
was found in both dorsiflexion (p=0.04) and palmar flexion
(p=0.01) in patients treated with wire fixation. There was a
statistically significant difference in radial inclination
(p=0.01) and dorsal tilt (p=0.03) between cast and wire
fixation in physis group with a more increased radial
inclination in wire fixation and a more dorsal tilt in patients
treated with a cast. All patients were pain-free except one
(5.3%) in the physis group who had only mild pain. Overall
outcomes at skeletal maturity were excellent and good in all patients. Grip strength showed no statistical difference in all
groups. Complications of wire fixation included radial
physeal arrests, pin site infection and numbness.
Conclusion: Cast and wire fixation showed excellent and
good outcomes at skeletal maturity in children with previous
distal radius fracture involving both metaphysis and physis.
We would recommend that children who are still having at
least two years of growth remaining be treated with a cast
alone following a reduction unless there is a persistent
unacceptable reduction warranting a wire fixation. The site of the fracture and the type of treatment have no influence on the grip strength at skeletal maturity.
Keywords :
distal radius , metaphysis , physis , wire fixation , paediatric
Journal title :
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal