Title of article :
Functional Outcomes Following Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Reconstructions. A Three-year Experience in Seremban, Malaysia
Author/Authors :
JW, Ng Department of Orthopaedics - International Medical University - Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia , AR, Ahmad Department of Orthopaedics - Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar - Seremban - Malaysia , GN, Solayar Department of Orthopaedics - International Medical University - Seremban - Malaysia
Abstract :
Introduction: This study was conducted to evaluate the demographics, causes and outcomes of patients who underwent Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstruction and/or Posterolateral Corner (PLC)
reconstruction performed at our institution over the last three
years. Sub-analysis was performed to assess the impact of
delay from injury to surgery and how this affected outcomes.
Materials and Methods: From an initial number of 10
patients, seven were contactable and available for analysis.
All patients underwent PCL and/or PLC reconstruction
(modified Larson’s procedure) between 2017 and 2019. The
mean age of our cohort was 31.4±9.6 years (range, 21 to 46).
Assessment of functional outcomes pre- and postoperatively were done using the Lysholm knee scoring scale,
the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
and visual analogue scale (VAS). The mean follow-up from
operation at time of reporting was seven months (range, 2 to
12 months). Results: There were four combined PCL and PLCs, two
isolated PLCs and one patient who underwent an isolated
PCL reconstruction. There were significant improvements
between pre-operative and post-operative in all functional
outcome scores utilised following PCL reconstruction and/or
modified Larson’s reconstruction. Lysholm knee scoring
scale improved from pre-operative to post-operative at
41.14±12.32 to 74.86±13.52 (p=0.0001), KOOS from
49.71±11.19 to 71.43±13.84 (p=0.001), and VAS from
5.71±2.06 to 2.86±2.48 (p=0.001). Our sub-analysis showed
that higher functional outcomes were present when surgery
was done less than six months from the time of index injury.
There were no complications (eg. Infections, revisions) in
this cohort at the time of reporting. Conclusion: Reconstructive surgery for PCL and/or PLC
injury is successful in increasing the functional outcomes of
patients post-operatively. Delays from injury to surgery
remains a problem in the public setting as patients may need
to await appropriate imaging and approval of funding. Increased awareness for early surgical intervention may improve overall outcomes of PCL and/or PLC reconstruction in Malaysia.
Keywords :
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury , posterolateral corner (PLC) injury , PCL reconstruction , modified larson’s reconstruction , functional outcomes
Journal title :
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal