Author/Authors :
El-Badry, Mohamed Audio-Vestibular Medicine Minia University - Egypt , Samy, Hesham Audio-Vestibular Medicine Minia University - Egypt , Abdelkader, Rafeek Audio-Vestibular Medicine Minia University - Egypt , Fawzy, Amira Audio-Vestibular Medicine Minia University - Egypt
Abstract :
Objectives: Aims of the current work were to describe cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c-VEMP) in
children with ANSD of pre-lingual onset, and to compare c-VEMP findings to those in children with non- ANSD
sensorineural (non -ANSD SNHL) of pre-lingual onset.
Methods: The study included 35 children with bilateral ANSD, and 32 children with bilateral non-ANSD SNHL of
severe, severe to profound, or profound degree. Both groups of children had the onset SNHL pre-lingually. The study
also included 15 control children. Mean age and SD were 6.9 years ± 2.9 for the control children, 7.8 years ± 3.1 for the
ANSD children, and 8.8 years ± 3.4 for the non-ANSD children. All participant children were subjected to full history
taking, otological examination, hearing assessment, recording for auditory brainstem response and cochlear microphonics,
Distortion product otoacoustic emission recording, and c-VEMP recording.
Results: Results showed that the vast majority of ANSD children (88% of ears) had intact c-VEMP response. Moreover,
there was no statistically significant difference between the ANSD children and control children as regards the VEMP
parameters (P1-N1 amplitude, asymmetric ratio, P1 latency, N1 latency, and inter-aural latency differences of P1 and N1).
There was no statistically significant difference between ANSD with risk factors and those without risk factors as regards
VEMP parameters. Results indicate that the vast majority of ANSD children with pre-lingual onset, even those with risk
factors, have normal saccular function along with intact and normally functioning inferior vestibular nerve, and the other
central connections responsible for the VEMP response. On the other hand, 53.1% of ears children with non-ANSD
SNHL had an absent c-VEMP response, and 46.9% of ears had intact and normal c-VEMP response. The overall results
indicate that while the pathology of non-ANSD SNHL involves the saccule in more than half of children, the underlying
pathology ANSD spares the saccule and its central connection. Conclusions: Results suggest that the site of lesion in ANSD children of pre-lingual onset is restricted to the auditory
system with sparing the vestibular system in the majority of children. These findings support the choice of cochlear
implantation as the best line of management in children with ANSD, even in the presence of risk factors. So cochlear
implantation in children with ANSD is safer than children with SNHL as there will be no fear of bilateral saccular
dysfunction in the case saccular damage occurred in the surgery side as a result of the surgical procedure.