Title of article :
Influence of Environmental Factors on Social Participation Post-Stroke
Author/Authors :
Foley, Erin L Department of Occupational Therapy - MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston MA, USA , Nicholas, Marjorie L Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders - MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston MA, USA , Baum, Carolyn M Program in Occupational Therapy and Departments of Neurology & Social Work - Washington University, Louis MO, USA , Connor, Lisa Tabor Department of Occupational Therapy - MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston MA, USA
Abstract :
Objectives. For rehabilitation professionals to adequately address meaningful participation in social activities with their patients
after a stroke, there must be a better understanding of neurobehavior, that is, how neurological impairment and its sequelae and
environmental factors support or limit social participation. The current study examines how stroke severity (NIH Stroke Scale),
its impact on perceived mobility (Stroke Impact Scale mobility domain), and the environment (MOS Social Support–Positive
Social Interactions scale and Measure of Stroke Environment receptivity and built environment domains) influence social
participation (Activity Card Sort: ACS). Methods. A correlational, cross-sectional design examined the relationships among
neurological impairment, perceived limitations in activity, environmental factors, and social participation. Participants included
48 individuals who were at least 6 months post-stroke both with aphasia (N = 22) and without aphasia (N = 26) living in the
community for whom all measures were available for analysis. Results. No differences in social participation were found between
those with and without aphasia, though both groups reported a large (25-30%) decline in participating in their prestroke social
activities. For the ACS Social Domain activities and ACS Partner to Do With activities (percent retained), 37% and 35% of the
variance, respectively, was accounted for by the predictor variables, with only MOS Social Support making an independent
contribution to social participation. In this sample, neurological impairment was not a significant correlate of social
participation. Additionally, perceived mobility and the built environment were not found to independently predict participation
in social activities. Conclusions. Perceived social support was found to predict social participation in individuals living in the
community 6 months or greater post-stroke. Focusing on social support during post-stroke rehabilitation may provide an
avenue for increased social participation and more successful community reintegration
Keywords :
Influence , Environmental Factors , Social Participation Post-Stroke
Journal title :
Behavioural Neurology