Efficacy and Complications of Life-Control Portable Resuscitator for Transport of In-Hospital Patients

Aim. Equipment used for in-hospital patient transfers should be safe for the patient, inexpensive, and easy to use. Disposable mechanical ventilators are a reasonable choice for in-hospital transfers. Life-control Portable Resuscitator (LPR) is a gas-powered automatic resuscitator designed for short-term ventilation during the transport of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the efcacy and safety of, and complications associated with, the LPR. Materials and Methods. A total of 77 (age > 18 years) critically ill mechanically ventilated emergency service patients transported to in-hospital units with an LPR were included in this study. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (numbers and percentages), and continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviation with corresponding 95% confdence intervals (CIs). Paired-sample t-tests were used to analyze normally distributed variables. Results. Vital signs showed no signifcant diference afer transport. Afer transport mean pH, PaCO2, and lactate levels of all patients increased statistically signifcantly and approached normal range values. PaO2 levels increased signifcantly afer transport. HCO3, PIP, and BE showed no signifcant diference afer transport. Device-related complications during transport included O2 cable disconnection (11.6%), device failure (2.59%), vomiting (1.2%), and extubation (2.59%). Conclusion. In our study group, the LPR was reliable according to the vital signs and blood gas analyses, although these devices should be used only by skilled personnel due to the possible risk of complications during transport.