• Title of article

    Utility of a Modified Oropharyngeal Airway for Performing Tracheal Intubation Using a Fiberoptic Bronchoscope and Video Stylet: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using a Manikin

  • Author/Authors

    Lee, Jang Hee Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul - Republic of Korea , Na, Ji Ung Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul - Republic of Korea , Hyuk Shin, Dong Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul - Republic of Korea , Choi, Pil Cho Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul - Republic of Korea , Park, Sang O Department of Emergency Medicine - School of Medicine - Konkuk University - Konkuk University Medical Centre - Seoul, Republic of Korea , Kim, Won Jae Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Seoul - Republic of Korea , Kuk Han, Sang Department of Emergency Medicine - Kangbuk Samsung Hospital - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul - Republic of Korea

  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    7
  • Abstract
    Purpose. .e purpose of this study was to assess if a modified airway (MA), developed by the authors, would act as a guide and improve the performance of intubation when used with a video stylet (VS) or fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) for endotracheal intubation. Methods. .is randomized crossover simulation study using manikins was conducted with 36 novice operators. Time to complete intubation, time to see the glottis, and success rate of intubation of each device were measured and compared with or without use of MA. Results. For intubation using FOB with MA, the median time to complete intubation significantly reduced from 46 to 31 seconds with a medium effect size (p � 0.004, r � 0.483), and the median time to see the glottis significantly reduced from 7 to 5 seconds with a medium effect size (p � 0.032, r � 0.357). .e overall success rate was not statistically different between FOB with MA (33/36, 91.7%) and FOB alone (31/36, 86.1%); however, the cumulative success rate over time for FOB with MA was higher than that for FOB alone (p � 0.333). For intubation using VS, there were no differences in the time to see the glottis and time to complete intubation between VS with MA and VS alone (p � 0.065 and p � 0.926, respectively), and the cumulative success rate was not statistically significant (p � 0.594). Conclusion. Adjunct use of MA helped reduce time to complete intubation in FOB, but not in VS. If an inexperienced operator uses FOB, it would be helpful to use MA as an adjunct device.
  • Keywords
    modified airway (MA) , Tracheal Intubation , Fiberoptic Bronchoscope , Video Stylet , Randomized Crossover Trial , Manikin
  • Journal title
    Emergency Medicine International
  • Serial Year
    2020
  • Record number

    2607394