Title of article :
Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study
Author/Authors :
Kim, Hee Eun Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Lee, Kui Ja Department of Emergency Medical Services - Kyungdong University - Wonju - Gangwon 26495 - Republic of Korea , Jo, You Hwan Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Lee, Jae Hyuk Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Kim, Yu Jin Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Kim, Joong Hee Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Lee, Dong Keon Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Kim, Dong Won Department of Emergency Medicine - Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital - Hallym University College of Medicine - Chuncheon - Gangwon 24253 - Republic of Korea , Park, Seung Min Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea , Taeck Oh, Young Department of Emergency Medicine - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital - Seongnam - Gyeonggi 13620 - Republic of Korea
Abstract :
Introduction. Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application
of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. Methods. /is is a retrospective pilot study
performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. /e prephase was from January to December 2016.
/e post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one
defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital
discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical
analysis was conducted using Fisher’s exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05. Result. A total of 38
patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. /e DSiD group had
a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p � 0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge
(7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p � 0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the
conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p � 0.207).
Conclusion. In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months.
Keywords :
double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) , Ventricular Fibrillation Treated , Pilot Study , Double Simultaneous Defibrillation
Journal title :
Emergency Medicine International