Author/Authors :
Garza-Gonzalez, Elvira Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Mendoza-Olazaran, Soraya Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Morfin-Otero, Rayo Universidad de Guadalajara - Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde e Instituto de Patologıa Infecciosa y Experimental - Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Jalisco, Mexico , Ramırez-Fontes, Andrea Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Rodrıguez-Zulueta, Patricia Infectious Diseases Service - Hospital General Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico , Flores-Treviño, Samantha Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Bocanegra-Ibarias, Paola Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Maldonado-Garza, Hector Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico , Camacho-Ortiz, Adrian Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Facultad de Medicina - Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzlez, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
Abstract :
Aim
In this study, we conducted a comparative study to explore the differences in therapeutic efficacy and intestinal microbiome of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) vs. FMT in addition with Lactobacillus (FMT-L) for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (R-CDI).
Methods
We designed a double-blinded randomized comparative two-arm pilot multicenter study to assess the efficacy and impact in the intestinal microbiome of standard capsules of FMT vs. FMT-L enriched with 3 species of Lactobacillus for patients with R-CDI. A 90-day follow-up of 21 patients was performed, starting at the beginning of the study. From the selected patients, fecal samples were obtained at days 0, 3, 7, and 28 after treatment. Fecal samples and FMT were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing.
Results
We included 21 patients (13 in the FMT group and 8 in the FMT-L group). Overall, both groups had a reduction in bowel movements per day, from 8.6 to 3.2 in the first 48 h (62.7% reduction, p=0.001). No severe adverse reactions or recurrences were recorded. Firmicutes were the most abundant phylum in donors. A low relative abundance of Proteobacteria was detected and mostly found in patients even at higher proportions than the donor. The donor's pool also had relatively few Bacteroidetes, and some patients showed a higher abundance of this phylum. Based on the ANOSIM R values, there is a significant difference between the microbial communities of basal samples and samples collected on day 7 (p=0.045) and at day 28 (0.041).
Conclusion
Fecal microbiota transplant by capsules was clinically and genomically similar between traditional FMT and enriched FMT with Lactobacillus spp. Restoration of bacterial diversity and resolution of dysbiosis at days 7 and 28 were observed. Patients with a first episode of recurrence treated with FMT had an excellent response without severe adverse events; FMT should be considered as an early treatment during R-CDI.
Keywords :
Intestinal Microbiome Changes , Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) , Lactobacillus , Clostridioides difficile Infection