The comparison of gains prescribed for digital behind-the-ear hearing aids using the manufacturer-specific and conventional prescriptive formulas

Background and Aim: There are several prescriptive formulas for covering a variety of hearing loss, each of which applies relatively different amplifications at different frequencies. This study aims to compare the gains prescribed for digital behindtheear (BTE) hearing aids by the Desired Sensation Level MultiStage [Input/Output] (DSLm[I/O]), National Acoustic Laboratories-non linear2 (NALNL2) and manufacturer-specific formulas at different levels of input intensity. Methods: The gain values in 12channel BTE hearing aids prepared from four companies (Oticon, Phonak, ReSound and Siemens) were measured at three levels of input intensity (45, 65, and 85 dB SPL) and at a frequency range of 250-8000 Hz for two moderately severe flat and mild sloping to severe hearing losses by using the DSLm[I/O], NALNL2 and manufacturerspecific formulas in the Frye FP35 test box. Results: There was no significant difference between the four selected hearing aids in terms of prescribed gain values using the prescriptive formulas (p 0.05). Conclusion: The DSLm[I/O] formula prescribes higher gain in the 12-channel BTE hearing aids from Oticon, Phonak and Siemens companies at all input intensities and frequencies for moderately severe flat and mild sloping to severe hearing losses compared to the NAL-NL2 formula and manufacturerspecific formulas (Voice Aligned Compression (VAC), Adaptive Phonak, Connexx Fit and audiogram+).