Title of article :
Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
Author/Authors :
Lu, Weifen Department of Respiration - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China , Pan, Qianli Department of Respiration - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China , Zhou, Yinxin Department of Respiration - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China , Chen, Wenyu Department of Respiration - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China , Zhang, Hongyan Department of Respiration - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China , Qi, Weibo Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery - First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University) - Jiaxing, China
Abstract :
To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from
needle stick injuries. Methods. A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion
needle were included and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Disposable infusion needles
with a separation-free safety tube were used in the intervention group, whereas conventional ones were used in the control
group. Then, effects of the two types of infusion sets were observed and compared. Results. As for the operation time for
infusion, it was (82:19 ± 1:80) seconds in the intervention group and (83:02 ± 1:83) seconds in the control group, with the
difference statistically significant (P < 0:05). Besides, the exposure time of the needles after infusion in the intervention group
was (3:36 ± 0:17) seconds while (18:85 ± 1:18) seconds in the control group; the difference between which was statistically
significant (P < 0:05). In terms of the time for needle disposal, (18:60 ± 0:84) seconds was required in the intervention group,
while for the control group, it took (18:85 ± 1:18) seconds, and the difference between two groups was of statistical significance
as well (P < 0:05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the accidental slip rate of the needles as that
turned out 0% in both groups (P > 0:05). It was worth noting that the block rate of the disposed needles in the intervention
group was 100%. Conclusion. The separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle could instantly block the sharp
needle after infusion, which reduces the needle exposure time and lowers the risk of needle stick injuries. In the meantime, the
safety tube is convenient to use, and its application can shorten the time for infusion and needle disposal, consequently
improving the working efficiency of nurses. As the new type safety tube has above advantages and would not raise the risk of
needle slippage, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Keywords :
Separation-Free , Tube , Needle , WHO , HIV
Journal title :
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine