Author/Authors :
Shan, Guogen School of Public Health - University of Nevada Las Vegas - Las Vegas, USA , Zhang, Hua School of Computer and Information Engineering - Zhejiang Gongshang University - Hangzhou - Zhejiang, China , Jiang, Tao School of Business - Zhejiang Gongshang University - Hangzhou, China
Abstract :
Repeated measures are increasingly collected in a study to investigate the trajectory of measures over time. One of the first research
questions is to determine the correlation between two measures. +e following five methods for correlation calculation are
compared: (1) Pearson correlation; (2) correlation of subject means; (3) partial correlation for subject effect; (4) partial correlation
for visit effect; and (5) a mixed model approach. Pearson correlation coefficient is traditionally used in a cross-sectional study.
Pearson correlation is close to the correlations computed from mixed-effects models that consider the correlation structure, but
Pearson correlation may not be theoretically appropriate in a repeated-measure study as it ignores the correlation of the outcomes
from multiple visits within the same subject. We compare these methods with regard to the average of correlation and the mean
squared error. In general, correlation under the mixed-effects model with the compound symmetric structure is recommended as
its correlation is close to the nominal level with small mean square error.