Title of article :
CRT-D or CRT-P in CRT-indicated patients?
Author/Authors :
Kaya, Adnan Department of Cardiology - Suruç State Hospital - Şanlıurfa - Turkey , Adem Tatlısu, Mustafa Postdoctoral Research Associate - Texas A&M Institute for Preclinical Studies - Texas - United States , İlker Tekkesin, Ahmet Department of Cardiology - Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Hospital – İstanbul - Turkey , Taha Alper, Ahmet Department of Cardiology - Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Hospital – İstanbul - Turkey
Abstract :
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRTD) has demonstrated advantages over implantable cardioverter
defibrillator (ICD) in terms of morbidity, symptom reduction, and
survival. But there is no exact data indicating benefit of adding an ICD in CRT-indicated patients, despite theoretically decreased risk of death due to arrhythmia with this combination
(1). Despite the lack of evidence, CRT-D is preferred over cardiac
resynchronization therapy with pacemaker (CRT-P) without any
strict recommendation. Here we would like to share our experience, which also favors CRT-D over CRT-P, but for another reason: pacing site-dependent arrhythmia.
Keywords :
CRT-D , CRT-P , CRT-indicated patients
Journal title :
The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology: Andolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi