Title of article :
Clinical risk scores predict procedural complications of primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Author/Authors :
Hadadi, Laszlo Departments of Internal Medicine - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş-Romania - Departments of Interventional Cardiology Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation - Tirgu Mureş - Romania , Constantin Şerban, Razvan Departments of Interventional Cardiology Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation; Tirgu Mureş-Romania - Physiology - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş -Romania , Scridon, Alina Physiology - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş - Romania , Şuş, Ioana Physiology - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş - Romania - Cardiology - Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation - Tirgu Mureş - Romania , Katalin Lakatos, Eva Departments of Internal Medicine - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş - Romania , Demjen6, Zoltan Cardiology - Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation - Tirgu Mureş - Romania , Dobreanu, Dan Physiology - University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mureş - Tirgu Mureş - Romania - Cardiology - Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation - Tirgu Mureş - Romania
Pages :
9
From page :
276
To page :
284
Abstract :
Objective: The predictive value of five risk score models containing clinical (PAMI-PMS, GRACE–GRS, and modified ACEF-ACEFm–scores), angiographic SYNTAX score (SXS) and combined Clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) variables were evaluated for the incidence of three procedural complications of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI): iatrogenic coronary artery dissection, angiographically visible distal embolization and angiographic no-reflow phenomenon. Methods: The mentioned scores and the incidence of procedural complications were retrospectively analyzed in 399 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent pPCI. Results: Coronary dissection, distal embolization and no-reflow occurred in 39 (9.77%), 71 (17.79%), and 108 (27.07%) subjects, respectively. Coronary dissections were significantly associated with higher GRS, ACEFm, and CSS values (all p<0.05). PMS, GRS, ACEFm, and CSS were significantly higher in patients with no-reflow (all p<0.05), while distal embolization was not predicted by any of the calculated scores. In multiple logistic regression models, GRS and ACEFm remained independent predictors of both coronary dissections (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.56–6.54, p<0.01 and o‎r 2.87, 95% CI 1.27–6.45, p=0.01, respectively) and no-reflow (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04–2.82, p=0.03 and o‎r 1.86, 95% CI 1.10–3.14, p=0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Whereas SXS failed to predict procedural complications related to pPCI, two simple, noninvasive risk models, GRS and ACEFm, independently predicted coronary dissections and no-reflow. Pre-interventional assessment of these scores may help the interventional cardiologist to prepare for procedural complications during pPCI.
Keywords :
myocardial infarction , risk assessment , percutaneous coronary intervention , no-reflow phenomenon , dissection
Journal title :
The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology: Andolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi
Serial Year :
2017
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2616746
Link To Document :
بازگشت