Author/Authors :
Houben, I. P. L Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands , van Berlo, C. J. L. Y Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands , Bekers, O Department of Clinical Chemistry - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands , Nijssen, E. C Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands , Lobbes, M. B. I Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands , Wildberger, J. E Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Center - Maastricht, Netherlands
Abstract :
To evaluate whether a handheld point-of-care (POC) device is able to predict and discriminate patients at potential risk
of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prior to iodine-based contrast media delivery. Methods and Materials. Between December
2014 and June 2016, women undergoing contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with an iodine-based contrast agent
were asked to have their risk of CIN assessed by a dedicated POC device (StatSensor CREAT) and a risk factor questionnaire based
on national guidelines. Prior to contrast injection, a venous blood sample was drawn to compare the results of POC with regular
laboratory testing. Results. A total of 351 patients were included; 344 were finally categorized as low risk patients by blood creatinine
evaluation. Seven patients had a eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
, necessitating additional preparation prior to contrast delivery. The
POC device failed to categorize six out of seven patients (86%), leading to (at that stage) unwanted contrast administration. Two
patients subsequently developed CIN after 2–5 days, which was self-limiting after 30 days. Conclusion. The POC device tested was
not able to reliably assess impairment of renal function in our patient cohort undergoing CESM. Consequently, we still consider
classic clinical laboratory testing preferable in patients at potential risk for developing CIN.
Keywords :
Risk , CINFIBS , Stick , CESM , CIN